Governments at all three levels are slammed constantly for things they do or don’t do that the public doesn’t believe makes sense. Sometimes though there is a ray of sunshine in an otherwise cloudy mess of uncertainty. We all watch the insanity of skyrocketing house prices in Vancouver and shake our heads in disbelief at reports of half-century old thousand square foot bungalows selling for $1.5 million on average.
Sometimes in a quiet moment, of which there are too few, I take a look at Coffeetalks I wrote years ago. Back on July 13th, 2003, I was reminiscing about how my baby boom generation grew up in the 50’s, 60’s and 70’s. According to some of today’s stiff-necked do-gooders most of us shouldn’t have survived. Why? Well, for example, the baby cribs we chewed on while teething were coated with lead-based paint. There were no childproof lids on medicine bottles or latches on cabinet doors.
Anyone who thinks our justice system needs some kind of overhaul will be interested in the latest edict from the Supreme Court of Canada. In a decision that criticizes this country’s legal system for what it calls a culture of complacency, the top court has set new rules for an accused’s right to be tried within a reasonable time frame. Any delays beyond the new times will be considered “presumptively unreasonable” and in violation of the accused’s charter rights.
$300 million is a lot of money. Canada’s chief electoral officer says $300 million is what it would cost to hold a referendum on electoral reform. The last time we had a national referendum was in 1992 on the Charlottetown Accord and was due to the failure of the Meech Lake Accord of 1990 trying to amend the constitution to get Quebec to sign on. The ’92 referendum failed as well, rejected by a majority of Canadians.
You know what bothers me the most about the Canada Post labour dispute? As in the past, it’s the fact that you and I, members of what’s quaintly referred to as the general public, are not privy to the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help me. All we know is what we hear on the radio, see on tv and read in the paper. And what we hear, see and read is what both sides in the dispute have spun for the media to pass on to the general public. Of course both sides want sympathy for their cause and will try to appear the victim and make the other side look like the bad guys.